is no joke, no less a trivial question the use of the Franco regime to make use of some public representatives of the PP in this province. It is not something that should be ignored and treated like a story and yes, on the contrary, expressly disqualified and rejected in the strongest terms. Nobody with a minimum of democratic sensibility may even hint of sympathy for an authoritarian political regime, condemned by the international institutions and the Congress of Deputies.
No one who has internalized the basic elements of democracy can relate to, even partially, with the Franco regime and if do is to immediately abandon their positions in political parties and democratic institutions. Who justifies, harbors and protects, maintains even symbolically or qualify proudly dictatorial and inhumane form of governing the coexistence, as was the Franco regime is, without doubt, a disabled person to establish any constitutional body. Who
to get some votes nostalgic memory holds about tough years, in which human rights are systematically violated, in which the prisons were filled with people just because of their ideology, in which the penalty death was imposed on the basis of spurious and without warranty processes, etc. is simply an accomplice of terror. I say all the words terror, although many English people do not have it then, it never came to fulfill the majority, that confer rights, the vast majority have never held the free speech, opinion, assembly, demonstration, etc. .
who resigned his year lived in peace. Those who, by contrast, fought for what we enjoy today normally experienced in the flesh fear, terror, prison, the plundering of their property and discrimination from their families. Many will have to deny these facts and ignoring reality do so, so stubborn are some to justify their beliefs based on falsehood, do not hesitate to distort reality itself, even lying to those who did not live those years and fables about its supposed greatness. They are so irresponsible they can be spreading the seeds of hatred, division, lack of respect for others. Denying that I had only an ideology, the official and who keep other was simply a criminal and as such was treated.
That a councilman, in this case, Orihuela, ose rate the Franco regime as the exponent of Spain "great and free" is not just some stupid thing that qualifies as such, but the expression of that democracy has permeated those are more comfortable in the scope of the "greatness and freedom" of the single party, the imposition on the other. If for someone denial of rights and freedoms is an expression of the greatness and freedom, that someone must be immediately excluded from areas representative of a democratic regime. Entiéndaseme well, not excluded from their rights, which recognize and respect, but of democratic representation and does not feel it. Or at least, the defending party, as the PP, whose statutes are incompatible with democracy and those who admire or respect even authoritarianism. It is, therefore, the PP must act firmly and do not tolerate actions like the ones I quote these lines. That municipalities Alicante and Benidorm and the Diputación Provincial, keep titles to Franco's favorite son, is an outrage that goes beyond the fact of violation of the law of historical memory and who votes for the perpetuation of the dictatorship of an irresponsible authoritarian inclinations for many justifications search arguments in another country would disqualify him absolutely.
reconciliation can only be complete when it recognizes the reality, when accepting the quality of the Franco regime dictatorial unmitigated, the assumption of its injustices, when they honor their victims. No one looks as a condemnation of the victors. They have already been condemned by all, less for their nostalgic. But respect for the vanquished that deserved respect for the fact that what is defended set of values \u200b\u200bthat now dominate the democratic coexistence. Further proof of reason is impossible.
Refuses Alicante Port facilities to be located at a monument to the last Republican who left Spain or did not make it the most miserable being transported to concentration camps. For this purpose, has no qualms about its board to argue that administrative rules do not apply to the case in a legal action or the unfortunate best likely to be taken as a joke if it were not there been inspired from the most incomprehensible nostalgia, ignoring other rules, perhaps unknown intent, under whose protection it is impossible to deny the memory of shame. Even to oppose the recognition of those who suffered repression, no doubt the Port to create a sort of post-petition ordinance, only case with trying to cover the reality of their actions, that is not reconciliation as claimed but the protection of Franco. That and no other is the reason that indirectly protects the always felt at home in the repression of those who today are his adversaries and even dare to rule this bull skin.
If you go to Europe will see their cities full of tributes to those who fought against fascism and Nazism. Shown with pride in resistance to authoritarian regimes. Not so in Spain even though the Franco regime was a regime similar to them. To deny that is foolishness or a sample of close to what should never happen. Too bad you have to have passed a law so that truth will be light, but greater shame is that even that law is evaded. To all of them, who want to perpetuate and idealize a shameful regime, publicly accuses them their behavior and call them to sanity. Many prisoners and many killed to defend what we now all enjoy, even themselves with their unlawful conduct, called from the memory of honesty. I say honesty in the broadest sense of the word. And who reply to this article should know that at the time of his admired General could not have done, would have cost the jail to oppose the government.
No one who has internalized the basic elements of democracy can relate to, even partially, with the Franco regime and if do is to immediately abandon their positions in political parties and democratic institutions. Who justifies, harbors and protects, maintains even symbolically or qualify proudly dictatorial and inhumane form of governing the coexistence, as was the Franco regime is, without doubt, a disabled person to establish any constitutional body. Who
to get some votes nostalgic memory holds about tough years, in which human rights are systematically violated, in which the prisons were filled with people just because of their ideology, in which the penalty death was imposed on the basis of spurious and without warranty processes, etc. is simply an accomplice of terror. I say all the words terror, although many English people do not have it then, it never came to fulfill the majority, that confer rights, the vast majority have never held the free speech, opinion, assembly, demonstration, etc. .
who resigned his year lived in peace. Those who, by contrast, fought for what we enjoy today normally experienced in the flesh fear, terror, prison, the plundering of their property and discrimination from their families. Many will have to deny these facts and ignoring reality do so, so stubborn are some to justify their beliefs based on falsehood, do not hesitate to distort reality itself, even lying to those who did not live those years and fables about its supposed greatness. They are so irresponsible they can be spreading the seeds of hatred, division, lack of respect for others. Denying that I had only an ideology, the official and who keep other was simply a criminal and as such was treated.
That a councilman, in this case, Orihuela, ose rate the Franco regime as the exponent of Spain "great and free" is not just some stupid thing that qualifies as such, but the expression of that democracy has permeated those are more comfortable in the scope of the "greatness and freedom" of the single party, the imposition on the other. If for someone denial of rights and freedoms is an expression of the greatness and freedom, that someone must be immediately excluded from areas representative of a democratic regime. Entiéndaseme well, not excluded from their rights, which recognize and respect, but of democratic representation and does not feel it. Or at least, the defending party, as the PP, whose statutes are incompatible with democracy and those who admire or respect even authoritarianism. It is, therefore, the PP must act firmly and do not tolerate actions like the ones I quote these lines. That municipalities Alicante and Benidorm and the Diputación Provincial, keep titles to Franco's favorite son, is an outrage that goes beyond the fact of violation of the law of historical memory and who votes for the perpetuation of the dictatorship of an irresponsible authoritarian inclinations for many justifications search arguments in another country would disqualify him absolutely.
reconciliation can only be complete when it recognizes the reality, when accepting the quality of the Franco regime dictatorial unmitigated, the assumption of its injustices, when they honor their victims. No one looks as a condemnation of the victors. They have already been condemned by all, less for their nostalgic. But respect for the vanquished that deserved respect for the fact that what is defended set of values \u200b\u200bthat now dominate the democratic coexistence. Further proof of reason is impossible.
Refuses Alicante Port facilities to be located at a monument to the last Republican who left Spain or did not make it the most miserable being transported to concentration camps. For this purpose, has no qualms about its board to argue that administrative rules do not apply to the case in a legal action or the unfortunate best likely to be taken as a joke if it were not there been inspired from the most incomprehensible nostalgia, ignoring other rules, perhaps unknown intent, under whose protection it is impossible to deny the memory of shame. Even to oppose the recognition of those who suffered repression, no doubt the Port to create a sort of post-petition ordinance, only case with trying to cover the reality of their actions, that is not reconciliation as claimed but the protection of Franco. That and no other is the reason that indirectly protects the always felt at home in the repression of those who today are his adversaries and even dare to rule this bull skin.
If you go to Europe will see their cities full of tributes to those who fought against fascism and Nazism. Shown with pride in resistance to authoritarian regimes. Not so in Spain even though the Franco regime was a regime similar to them. To deny that is foolishness or a sample of close to what should never happen. Too bad you have to have passed a law so that truth will be light, but greater shame is that even that law is evaded. To all of them, who want to perpetuate and idealize a shameful regime, publicly accuses them their behavior and call them to sanity. Many prisoners and many killed to defend what we now all enjoy, even themselves with their unlawful conduct, called from the memory of honesty. I say honesty in the broadest sense of the word. And who reply to this article should know that at the time of his admired General could not have done, would have cost the jail to oppose the government.
Note: bad. Every day is more the mark of the abandonment of Miguel Gutierrez. Knowing that it will not read these lines makes me sad. Try some on their way. Much left us although we are not able to approach the absolute fidelity that trumpeted.
José María Asencio Mellado is Professor of Procedural Law of the AU.
0 comments:
Post a Comment