The executive socialist PSOE flees to avoid meeting their responsibilities.
One year after deciding that the Government would not recognize the independence of Kosovo, Minister Chacón dares to proclaim that "it is time that the troops come home." It has taken more than a year to adjust to the military diplomacy, but could very well not have. The question then is why now? And since all you have to do with foreign and security action the Government understood in purely domestic key, thought out what revenue with its decision?
Chacon, Spain's not there alone, but integrated into a multinational force to respond to collective goals, not national.
Executive This is a socialist PSOE on the run and avoiding fulfill their responsibilities. He did it in Iraq, it has done in Afghanistan, with its many restrictions on the employment of forces, and does, without explanation or on KOVOS apropos. Even worse, it does a week away from the summit to celebrate 60 years of existence of the Atlantic Alliance. Nice way to go with it. Could it be that Zapatero is angry with Obama because he wants to come to Spain and pays with NATO?.
How to withdraw English troops from Kosovo, like Iraq, is another example of irresponsibility. It is not serious to act with such lightness in something along with the lives of our soldiers. More than likely that political leaders do not know the real motivations of the English military presence in missions abroad and that is the greatest danger to our troops. The English people must be aware of the problems affecting them, including its Prime Minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero.
The breakdown of solidarity in fact the vast majority of our partners and allies with the most splendid mitigated inconsistency: Our troops stayed to protect the alleged illegality had just committed.
For once the national embarrassment is duly reflected internationally. Everyone has been shocked and unhappy. But the English should be above all intrigued. Is it possible that those who govern us unable to analyze the consequences of their actions before making a decision of state? Or if he did or not do you wrong in your calculations? In some other, in any case it is not possible to pretend that unanimously disapproving. With what face will be presented the next three in the NATO summit in Strasbourg? "Dizzy roles in a large empty table while his colleagues do about cliques? Is it worthwhile for the Group of Twenty is extended to twenty? The withdrawing of the Balkans "is going to send to Afghanistan, to please Obama? But other Europeans have to fill our hole at the time that the American president pressured to address the pressing needs of distant Islamic country. Zapatero Is it still considers the interest to be in NATO is to boycott from within? What will embrace the Obama price that yearn?
desperately to get plausible explanations, but the time will give us some answers.
